After limited results testing the new toy on Saturday I decided to re-install it on Sunday Morning and test things out again for a few hours…
The installation consists of my FT 897 set at 100w. I am using my FC40 Auto Coupler which is installed outside on my VHF Mast and the TAK-tenna is suspended at 20 AGL and connected to the FC 40 using approx 20 feet of 300 ohm twinlead.
Just before 0900 eastern I fired everything up and started with the testing. I have decided to use the same nets I check into on a Sunday Morning as my benchmark. Due to my setup is impossible to do quick A/B testing so I will forgo actual signal reports but go more towards can I hear them and can they hear me…
I was able to hear stations on 80m before I switched from the long wire to the TAK-Tenna.
0900 was the start of the North Bay Net on 3.778 and I was able to get a match using the tuner. I was able to hear several stations in the background and actually make out VE3HMS Ian who was checking into the net. I was able to hear the NCS who was Paul VA3PC but not well enough to carry on a QSO. I lost all stations shortly after that. My noise level is at an S8 which was lower than the normal S9 I get with the long wire but normally I can always hear and check into the North Bay Net from home using the long wire…
After giving up on the North Bay Net at 0925 eastern and not hearing any other stations on 80m I decided to try 40m for a while… Giving the TAK-Tenna the benefit of the doubt I should mention that this is not a 80m antenna so using it on 80 and making the tuner sweat it out is making it more of a compromise that it was designed to be…
WA1NPO in Whitman Mass was on 7.260 operating a special event station from what they called a “living museum” Reports varied between 5/5 to 5/7 so I think the TAK-Tenna works better on 40 than 80. The testing continues
I jumped back to 80m for the OVMRC Pothole Net on 3.760 at 1000 hrs and the results were confusing. Two station VE3JW and VE3GX were stronger than they usually are. Both stations are within 1km of my home so its easy to tell the difference between +20 and +40. VE3EJJ who is in the west end of Ottawa however gave me a S5 as compared to my normal S9. I could not hear VA3TQX in the Renfrew Ontario area or VE3UUH in Eastons Corners Ontario. Once again on 80m I am having a S9 Noise level.
The antenna seems to be very directional on 80m. I have it orientated North South which means the best signal reports should be from the east and west. However there is a really strong null from the north as two stations that are normally are S9 to me are not there at all. One station only gave me a S1 instead of my usual S9.
The Net ended at 1100 EASTERN and I QSy’d over to 7.055 to see what I could hear of the Sunday Morning Roundtable Net which also serves as the warmup for the 40m Ontario Swap Shop. I was able to talk to Nick VE3NJG in London Ontario and got him on the first call. Reports were about average for this time of day with an S7 back at me and he was approximately S8. Concidering the exceptionally long conditions on 40m these days Ottawa to London at 11am is not bad. Nick, however is talking to several other stations and I am unable to hear them. I guess they are closer in to me than Nick is.
One thing to remember is that in my earlier postings I did mention that I did not follow the construction instructions to the letter. I am planning two more tests for the antenna. The next test will consist of swapping out the twin lead with 50 ohm coax and using my 857 LDG auto tuner combo. The third test would consist of re building the antenna and fully follow the instructions for antenna resonance and then see how it works. What I am trying to say is that todays results would be a bench mark as I have not really followed the instructions. When I follow their instructions things should only get better. Hams do like to experiment and I am no exception…
After using the antenna for a few hours now I am “not sorry” I bought it. It’s a little too early to be really impressed with it as with the poor and unstable band conditions these days make giving an objective review rather difficult.
It is stealth and small… Its design would definitely confuse anyone looking at it… Supporting it off the side of your apartment balcony in a fashion similar to how the sat antennas are mounted and then telling them “Its my homemade HD TV antenna”… would work especially if you add in the “I don’t complain about the Satellite Dishes why are you complaining about my TV antenna? Line… A little bit of battleship grey paint and no one would know the difference…

The biggest problems with a stealth antenna is that they usually look like antennas and that draws attention to them. The TAK-Tenna does not look like any sort of transmitting antenna I have ever seen and that is its biggest advantage… So far it seems to work fine…NOT GREAT… but fine… More on the higher bands in the near future…
73bob